Comparative Method of Weighted Product and TOPSIS to Determine The Beneficiary of Family Hope Program

Didit Suhartono, Tika Sari

Abstract


The Family Hope Program (PKH) is a government program that provides cash assistance to impoverished households. The implementation of PKH in Cimrutu Village has not been implemented optimally, namely prioritizing the targets of PKH participants who are not yet on targets. This happened because the officers in registering the poor were still using manual methods. To simplify the work and avoid miscalculation of data with the old system, a decision support system was built that could help make decisions on PKH recipients quickly and more accurately. The calculation method used is the Weighted Product (WP) method. Data collection methods used in this study were interviews and documentation. System development in this study uses waterfall through black-box testing. System design tools in the form of DFD and ERD. The software used in making this application is Visual Studio 2012, Xampp, and Crystal Reports. The programming language used is Java with its supporting database using MySQL. This decision support system is expected to be able to help officers in Cimrutu Village in selecting and determining communities that are eligible for PKH.


Article Metrics

Abstract: 292 Viewers PDF: 215 Viewers

Keywords


DSS; PKH; WP; TOPSIS.

Full Text:

PDF


References


Aloini, D., Dulmin, R., & Mininno, V. (2014). A peer IF-TOPSIS based decision support system for packaging machine selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(5), 2157-2165.

Anojkumar, L., Ilangkumaran, M., & Sasirekha, V. (2014). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(6), 2964-2980.

Bai, C., Dhavale, D., & Sarkis, J. (2014). Integrating Fuzzy C-Means and TOPSIS for performance evaluation: An application and comparative analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(9), 4186-4196.

Boran, F. E., Gen S., Kurt, M., & Akay, D. (2009). A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11363-11368.

Chang, C. H., Lin, J. J., Lin, J. H., & Chiang, M. C. (2010). Domestic open-end equity mutual fund performance evaluation using extended TOPSIS method with different distance approaches. Expert systems with applications, 37(6), 4642-4649.

Chen, S. M., & Lee, L. W. (2010). Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Expert systems with applications, 37(4), 2790-2798.

Cohen, I., & Iluz, M. (2015). When costeffective design strategies are not enough: Evidence from an experimental study on the role of redundant goals. Omega, 56, 99-111.

Darji, V. P., & Rao, R. V. (2014). Intelligent Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for Material Selection in Sugar Industry. Procedia Materials Science, 5, 2585-2594.

Evans, D. K., & Popova, A. (2016). Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Development: Accounting for Local Costs and Noisy Impacts. World Development, 77, 262-276.

Furlong, W., Feeny, D., Torrance, G., Goldsmith, C., DePauw, S., Zhu, Z., Denton, M., & Boyle, M. (1998). Multiplicative multi-attribute utility function for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) system: a technical report (No. 1998-11). Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Haluza, D., & Jungwirth, D. (2015). ICT and the future of health care: aspects of health promotion. International journal of medical informatics, 84(1), 48-57.

Jia, P., Govindan, K., Choi, T. M., & Rajendran, S. (2015). Supplier selection problems in fashion business operations with sustainability considerations. Sustainability, 7(2), 1603-1619.

Jun, K. S., Chung, E. S., Kim, Y. G., & Kim, Y. (2013). A fuzzy multi-criteria approach to flood risk vulnerability in South Korea by considering climate change impacts. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(4), 1003-1013.

Kerulien?, V., & Turskis, Z. (2011). Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection. Technological and Economic Developsment of Economy, 17(4), 645-666.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


barcodeInternational Journal of Informatics and Information Systems (IJIIS)
ISSN: 2579-7069 (online)
Organized by Information System Department - Universitas Amikom Purwokerto - Indonesia, Laboratoire Signaux Et Systèmes (L2s) - Université Paris 13 - France, and Bright Publisher
Published by Bright Publisher
Website : http://ijiis.org
Email : info@ijiis.orgtaqwa@ijiis.org, andhika@ijiis.org

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0