Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The journal scopes include (but not limited to) the followings:
Informatics : Operating System, Algorithm, Computer Architecture, Computer Network, Computer Security, Embedded system, Cloud Computing, Internet of Thing, Robotics, Computer Hardware
Information Technology : Information Management, Internet & Mobile
Data Scinces : Statistical Analysis, Data Mining, Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Text Mining, Mechine Learning
Information Systems: ICT interaction with society, ICT application in social science, ICT as a social research tool, ICT education, e-business, e-government.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for our focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw. This manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Single Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses. The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterwards, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.

 

Open Access Policy

IJIIS : International Journal of Informatics and Information Systems publishes fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. Non-commercial use and distribution in any medium is permitted, provided the author and the journal are properly credited.
Benefits of open access for author, include:



  • Free access for all users worldwide

  • Authors retain copyright to their work

  • Increased visibility and readership

  • Rapid publication

  • No spatial constraints

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

IJIIS: International Journal of Informatics and Information Systems

IJIIS : International Journal of Informatics and Information System is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to interchange for the results of high quality research in all aspect of Informatics, Information System, Information Technology and Data Sciences. The journal publishes state-of-art papers in fundamental theory, experiments and simulation, as well as applications, with a systematic proposed method, sufficient review on previous works, expanded discussion and concise conclusion. As our commitment to the advancement of Informatics and Information System, the IJIIS follows the open access policy that allows the published articles freely available online without any subscription. 


Frequency: 2 issues per year


e-ISSN : 2579-7069


DOI    : doi.org/10.47738/ijiis


Important Dates:


Paper Submission Date: Anytime
Acceptance Notification: 2-4 Months from Submission Date
Online Publication Date: Early date of March & September

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

International Journal of Informatics and Information Systems, called IJIIS, is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. The Editorial Board is responsible for, among others, preventing publication malpractice. Unethical behavior is unacceptable, and the IJIIS does not tolerate plagiarism in any form. Authors who submitted articles: affirm that manuscript contents are original. Furthermore, the authors’ submission also implies that the manuscript has not been published previously in any language, either wholly or partly, and is not currently submitted for publication elsewhere. Editors, authors, and reviewers, within the International Journal of Informatics and Information Systems, are to be fully committed to good publication practice and accept the responsibility for fulfilling the following duties and responsibilities, as set by the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors. As part of the Core Practices, COPE has written guidelines on the http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines.


Section A: Publication and authorship 



  1. All submitted papers are subject to a strict peer-review process by reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular manuscript.

  2. The review process is double-blind peer-review.

  3. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability, and language.

  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.

  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.

  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.

  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.

  8. No research can be included in more than one publication. 


Section B: Authors’ responsibilities



  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.

  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.

  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 

  4. The authors must participate in the peer-review process. 

  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.

  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.

  7. The authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.

  8. The authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.

  9. The authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.

  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors. 


Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities



  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information. 

  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author.

  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.

  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 


Section D: Editors’ responsibilities



  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.

  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.

  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.

  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.

  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.

  6. Editors should have a clear picture of research funding sources.

  7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity, and relevance to publication’s scope.

  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason. 

  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers. 

  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.

  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.

  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.

  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions; they should have proof of misconduct.

  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers, and board members.